Currently, advisories often reference themselves (references array in JSON):
- database advisory references itself, e.g. GHSA-r23g-3qw4-gfh2
- database advisory references repository advisory (with same GHSA ID), e.g. GHSA-xr7p-8q82-878q
Or are the actually cases where database advisory and repository advisory (both with the same GHSA ID) can differ in content? That would be quite confusing then.
These references are redundant and can be rather confusing because you expect references to provide additional information (and you might not immediately notice that the GHSA IDs are the same).
It is also not consistent, some advisories reference themselves while others don't.
Currently, advisories often reference themselves (
referencesarray in JSON):Or are the actually cases where database advisory and repository advisory (both with the same GHSA ID) can differ in content? That would be quite confusing then.
These references are redundant and can be rather confusing because you expect references to provide additional information (and you might not immediately notice that the GHSA IDs are the same).
It is also not consistent, some advisories reference themselves while others don't.