You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
Catalogue existing tools for Node.js post-mortem analysis. #6
One of the first actions from the meeting was to catalogue existing post mortem tools and identify any capability gaps. Raising this issue as somewhere to gather that information.
Does anyone have any objections to me starting a separate issues for tools/modules/approaches for generating "post-mortem" data, and keep this for tools that consume/analyze the data?
Shouldn't we list also the compatibilities and key features of each one of the available tools/technologies?It would make easier to define a list of requirements and contextualise them into real case scenarios.
Does it make sense?
@davepacheco I think we should actually match use cases -> users -> tools and generate a requirements list. I am not a believer of "one size fits all" software ;-)
If this makes sense, shouldn't we create just one issue that we can start to document?
I would like to help here as we are using heavily post-mortem in development and production.
Activity
davepacheco commentedon Jul 29, 2015
seabaylea commentedon Jul 30, 2015
Adding IDDE to the list:
Does anyone have any objections to me starting a separate issues for tools/modules/approaches for generating "post-mortem" data, and keep this for tools that consume/analyze the data?
lucamaraschi commentedon Sep 9, 2015
Shouldn't we list also the compatibilities and key features of each one of the available tools/technologies?It would make easier to define a list of requirements and contextualise them into real case scenarios.
Does it make sense?
davepacheco commentedon Sep 10, 2015
@lucamaraschi I think that's covered by #7, but it wouldn't hurt to include that information about each of the tools as well.
lucamaraschi commentedon Sep 10, 2015
@davepacheco I think we should actually match use cases -> users -> tools and generate a requirements list. I am not a believer of "one size fits all" software ;-)
If this makes sense, shouldn't we create just one issue that we can start to document?
I would like to help here as we are using heavily post-mortem in development and production.
richardlau commentedon Aug 15, 2018
Closing due to inactivity. If this work still needs to be tracked, please open a new issue over in https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics.