Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.

Catalogue existing tools for Node.js post-mortem analysis. #6

Closed

Description

@hhellyer

One of the first actions from the meeting was to catalogue existing post mortem tools and identify any capability gaps. Raising this issue as somewhere to gather that information.

Tool Description URL
node-inspector Standalone version of the Chrome dev tools https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-inspector
heapdump Trigger v8 heap dumps from javascript https://www.npmjs.com/package/heapdump
mdb_v8 JavaScript and C inspection for core files and live processes. Also contains a general description of postmortem debugging and tips for doing so. https://github.com/joyent/mdb_v8

Activity

  1. davepacheco commented on Jul 29, 2015

    @davepacheco
    Tool Description URL
    mdb_v8 JavaScript and C inspection for core files and live processes. Also contains a general description of postmortem debugging and tips for doing so. https://github.com/joyent/mdb_v8
  2. seabaylea commented on Jul 30, 2015

    @seabaylea
    Contributor

    Adding IDDE to the list:

    Tool Description URL
    IDDE Cross-platform JavaScript, Java and C inspection for core files. Runs in an Eclipse IDE but also provides client/server support https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/tools/idde/

    Does anyone have any objections to me starting a separate issues for tools/modules/approaches for generating "post-mortem" data, and keep this for tools that consume/analyze the data?

  3. lucamaraschi commented on Sep 9, 2015

    @lucamaraschi
    Contributor

    Shouldn't we list also the compatibilities and key features of each one of the available tools/technologies?It would make easier to define a list of requirements and contextualise them into real case scenarios.
    Does it make sense?

  4. davepacheco commented on Sep 10, 2015

    @davepacheco

    @lucamaraschi I think that's covered by #7, but it wouldn't hurt to include that information about each of the tools as well.

  5. lucamaraschi commented on Sep 10, 2015

    @lucamaraschi
    Contributor

    @davepacheco I think we should actually match use cases -> users -> tools and generate a requirements list. I am not a believer of "one size fits all" software ;-)
    If this makes sense, shouldn't we create just one issue that we can start to document?
    I would like to help here as we are using heavily post-mortem in development and production.

  6. richardlau commented on Aug 15, 2018

    @richardlau
    Member

    Closing due to inactivity. If this work still needs to be tracked, please open a new issue over in https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions